Most of the time, we did both. If we wanted to introduce a new process, refactor something, etc., I first do a Technical Proposal. Later, if it's accepted, I document it in more technical terms in an ADR, also mentioning the proposal, so it's clear why we needed it in the first place.
Most of the time, we did both. If we wanted to introduce a new process, refactor something, etc., I first do a Technical Proposal. Later, if it's accepted, I document it in more technical terms in an ADR, also mentioning the proposal, so it's clear why we needed it in the first place.
Most of the time, we did both. If we wanted to introduce a new process, refactor something, etc., I first do a Technical Proposal. Later, if it's accepted, I document it in more technical terms in an ADR, also mentioning the proposal, so it's clear why we needed it in the first place.
Ahh, makes sense. Thanks for sharing your approach, Petar